“Holy makeup and Botox, Batman!” Democratic media strategist Vince Monroy reacted on Bluesky. Lawrence County election commissioner Chris D. Jackson snarked that Gaetz showed up “with some fresh botox” on his first night.
“I
see Matt Gaetz went in to ask for the ‘Wayne Newton Face’ before his
OAN debut tonight,” liberal social media influencer Ron Filipkowski added. Meanwhile, another user on X (formerly Twitter) wondered: “Why is Matt Gaetz turning into a character from Spaceballs?”
When
reached for comment, Gaetz said that his “appearance always seems to be
of great interest to people,” adding that he “never really understood
why.”
i'm so tired of
women being attacked for cosmetic surgery while men get a pass. matt
gaetz looks like a freak. and go read stan's '10 actors who should be retired and go off into obscurity' about how sylvester
stallone has had so much plastic surgery that he no longer looks human.
Former U.S. Congressman Adam Kinzinger (R-IL) told a panel led by CNN’s Anderson Cooper that he doesn’t want a presidential pardon from Joe Biden before the President cedes the Oval Office to President-elect Donald Trump.
Kinzinger says that he understands “the theory” around pardon talk for
Trump’s avowed enemies, a long list of detractors on which he, fellow
Jan 6 Committee member and former Congresswoman Liz Cheney (R-WY), and Sen. Adam Schiff (D-CA) are near the top.
Rejecting
the pardon chatter — “I don’t want it,” he says — Kinzinger claims that
the one problem is the optics. “The second a pardon is issued,” he
says, “you look like you’re guilty of something.”
The
rejection comes even as the former Congressman fully expects the new
Trump administration to come after him to deliver retribution “because
Donald Trump has clearly said he’s going to go after everybody.”
(Kinzinger was a key Trump antagonist on the January 6 Committee, a role
that essentially cost him his congressional seat as MAGA surged in influence.)
i am an american citizen who believes in democracy. i will defend adam. he did nothing wrong. nor did liz cheney. nicholas liu ('salon') reports:
President Joe Biden's decision Thursday to award former
Rep. Liz Cheney, R-Wyo., with the second-highest honor a president can
bestow has angered pro-Trump Republicans, who have long accused the
conservative lawmaker and frequent critic of President-elect Donald Trump as a traitor to the party.
In
granting the Presidential Citizens Medal to Cheney and Rep. Bennie
Thompson, D-Miss., Biden acknowledged their role in leading the House
investigation into Trump's involvement in the Jan. 6 insurrection. The
committee disbanded after unanimously voting in December 2022 to refer
Trump for prosecution.
Trump and his allies have said that they and other members of the panel should be jailed for
their efforts, with Cheney earning particular condemnation from that
corner of the political world due largely to her prominence in the GOP.
Then-House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., booted her from the
party leadership in 2021, and in 2022 she lost her seat against a
primary challenger.
Cheney's
latest return to the spotlight provoked a fresh round of outrage, with
her home-state colleague and No. 2 Senate Republican John Barrasso,
R-Wyo., declaring in a statement that
Biden “was either going to pardon Liz Cheney or give her an award. She
doesn’t deserve either. She represents partisanship and divisiveness —
not Wyoming.”
liz stood
up for this country and for democracy. i'm a democrat. that means i
support liz. and, let's be clear, it's not just maga idiots attacking
liz. remember last friday's 'the oklahoma trash behind 'i've had it' podcast'? yep, fat and flat - the 2 bimbos of
'i've had it' - were attacking liz as well.
they're so damn stupid.
they really are. bimbos like that insult us all.
we
want people to be true to democracy like adam and liz were. we want
people to support our candidates - as adam and liz did.
and then along comes 2 bimbos attacking joe biden for honoring liz and attacking liz?
who did those bimbos think they were helping?
oh, wait. they're bimbos. they don't how to think.
Tuesday, January 7, 2025. Senator Patty Murray notes the cap on
prescription drugs, Donald Chump whines and whines, one of his lackeys
lies for him (how is that different from any other day), BLUESKY and
much more.
One bright spot in the bleak year of 2024 was the rise
of Bluesky. As someone who relied greatly on Twitter for news and my
career—OK, I may have been somewhat addicted—before Elon Musk bought it
and turned it into a snake pit of neo-Nazi filth, it was nice to see a
Twitter-like replacement rise to relative prominence.
I joined in April 2023 as about the 47,000th user. Today, Bluesky has about 26 million users,
and seems to be growing healthily. It actually has some notable
improvements on Twitter, like the “starter pack” function where users
can put together a group of accounts that one can follow at once (here’s
the starter pack for Prospect writers,
incidentally), or the “nuclear block” where if one participant in a
conversation blocks the other, the entire conversation is zapped. This
greatly cuts down on Twitter’s culture of aggressive pile-ons and abuse.
Unlike any other big platform, Bluesky does not censor posts with
outgoing links. Indeed, it does not have any proprietary “for you”
algorithm, instead defaulting to a traditional reverse-chronological
feed, and allowing users to pick from algorithms that can be developed
by others. This has major implications for publishers: Despite its
modest size, The Guardianreports that Bluesky traffic has already outstripped that from Twitter, and here at the Prospect Bluesky traffic now regularly matches Twitter and is many times that of Facebook.
This ability to share outside the platform is proving so popular that Facebook’s Twitter clone, Threads, has belatedly altered its algorithm
to include more posts from accounts you follow in an attempt to
compete. And this disruption is being done on a shoestring
budget—Bluesky has just 20 employees and about $23 million in funding, as compared to Meta’s 70,000+ workers and $156 billion in annual revenue.
It’s strong evidence that there is a large unmet demand for internet
systems outside of the control of Big Tech monopolists. I don’t know if
there can be a similar option for every walled garden on the
internet—it’s hard to dislodge a giant—but there’s no question that
there’s a lot of pent-up demand.
You can find out a lot on BLUESKY.
David Sirota's always a dirty fool.
Whether attacking the mother of an Iraq War veterans for speaking out
against the Iraq War (and against the senator David worked for) or
threatening us here because we pointed out what David left out when he
attacked Tina in the column -- that the senator she was confronting was
David's mentor and former boss. Sort of a basic disclosure required in
journalism but David thinks he makes up his own rules.
He
has a filthy mouth and a lazy brain and that's why, when he was wrongly
nominated for an Academy Award (for co-writing a piece of crap), I
attended every event ahead of voting to make sure he didn't get the
award -- I attended and took along printed copies of the nasty,
threatening, bullying e-mail he sent me.
It really exposed the true side of him to people who, like most of the world, would otherwise not even know his name.
POST-LEFT
WATCH is on BLUESKY. We've noted them for a couple of months now.
They're someone to watch and follow. They call out the crazy.
Isn't it great when a White man
-- especially a liar like Christian -- wants to tell us about the
targeting of a Black man and to explain it wasn't like what we thought
it was.
He's such a damn liar and such a damn
disgrace to his father. He's also a closeted Socialist but, remember,
we're never supposed to talk about that.
So there he was on Jimmy Dore rewriting history like only a Democrat hating Socialist can.
It's
hard for me to think of his nonsense without thinking of THE NEW YORK
TIMES which launched a huge attack against Dr King and did so long
before The Poor People's Campaign of 1968. THE NEW YORK TIMES not only
attacked him repeatedly -- and is corporate media, therefore a
corporation -- but continued to attack and to denigrate him long after
he was dead.
And they carried the attacks over
onto Coretta. When she died, please remember, NYT had 'playwright' (she
was not that good and she certainly wasn't worthy of more attention than
Coretta Scott King) on the front page, ran three or so columns on her
passing, did an editorial on her, blah blah blah, it never ended.
"Why are you attacking me?"
That's what the paper's sole Black columnist at the time asked me.
Well,
golly gee, you're Black and you have space on the op-ed pages and
you're ignoring the fact that the paper is refusing to run columns --
because there were submissions by big name Black academics -- about
Coretta's passing. You're on the op-ed pages and you're writing garbage
columns when you could be highlighting a pioneering Black woman who
fought for a better America for all and continued her husband's legacy
after he was assassianted.
The guilt trip got
Coretta into a column by Bob. Got her into it. It wasn't about her.
But he worked in for two or three paragraphs.
And of course, Christian brings up the truth and the lies of NYT.
Put
him on a minor media program with a small audience and he's telling the
audience about how Dexter Filkins and John F Burns (NYT 'reporters')
really were in the Green Zone. Dexter especially did whatever the US
military told him. That included, Christian said on air, cancelling
interviews when the US military conveyed that they'd prefer he not speak
to this or that person.
Now if he was going
on something mainstream, he'd say exactly the opposite. And of course
when he was on an in-between program, he'd justify Dexy with comments
like, 'The Dexter Filkins on the pages of THE NEW YORK TIMES is not the
Dexter Filkins in Baghdad' -- meaning that it was the paper's problem
and not Dexter bad journalism.
For those who
don't know, our first weekend online back in 2004 called out Dexter for
lies in print. He won awards for those lies. Is my face red? No.
Because he covered up War Crimes with that article. He covered them
up. They're known now but everyone looks the other way. In 40 years,
people will be calling for the dead reporter to be stripped of the
prizes for his lying.
In forty years when it no longer matters.
But don't expect Christian to tell you any of that.
On
Iraq, this may be our last Iraq snapshot and the title may change to
snapshot tomorrow. I need to check. Don't have time this second
because we have other things still to cover.
BLUESKY is where it's happening.
TWITTER
is for elderly hate mongers -- like Katrina vanden Heuvel of THE NATION
who led the attacks on Kamala. But TWITTER's not the only cesspool. Travis Gettys (RAW STORY) explains:
Facebook's parent company will make changes to its fact-checking to more closely resemble the site formerly known as Twitter.
Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced Tuesday morning that content
moderation and other restrictions on speech would be lifted across
Facebook, Instagram and other platforms as Donald Trump returns to the White House, reported Fox News.
"We’re
going to get back to our roots and focus on reducing mistakes,
simplifying our policies and restoring free expression on our
platforms," Zuckerberg said in a video
posted Tuesday morning. "More specifically, we’re going to get rid of
fact-checkers and replace them with Community Notes similar to X,
starting in the U.S."
The company's third-party fact-checking program was put into place
following Trump's first election win to "manage content" and
misinformation on its platforms, which executives conceded was the
result of "political pressure," but they now say that system has "gone
too far."
In other news, Convicted Felon Donald Chump is still being a big titty
baby because he's the continual disappointment that his father loathed
and he's the man that could never satisfy Ivana. He's just an immature
jerk who never grew up and never stopped to grasp that there were other
people on the earth and that they had feelings and the right to expect
to be recognized. Chump doesn't want to appear in person or via the
internet on January 10th when he is to be sentenced. His howler monkey
Steven Cheung (who at 42 looks 97) declared, "The American People
elected President Trump with an overwhelming mandate that demands an
immediate end to the political weaponization of our justice system and
all of the remaining Witch Hunts." Chump lied on official documents.
There's no excuse for that and he can't pardon himself because it's not
federal. Chump is a sleazy, two-bit crook and that's what the record is
going to reflect this week and forever more.
As for a mandate?
No, Steven, the American people didn't give him a mandate.
As
Elaine noted Friday, there is no mandate. 1.8% isn't a mandate.
That's all Chump won by. Ronald Reagan in 1984? He got a mandate. LBJ
in 1964? He got a mandate.
Steven's clearly confused. Must be overwork, right? Can't be personal since he has no personal life.
So
it's work that consumes him. And let us be the first to reveal his
heretofore never discussed acting career. For several years, Steven has
appeared on the series AMERICAN DAD.
Don't know about you, but I think the jewels really make his eyes pop.
Speaking of idiots, Evan Williams (TAG24 NEWS) reports on one, "Republican
Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman had to be shamed into agreeing
to lower US flags to half-mast in honor of the late ex-president Jimmy
Carter." And now note this from the article:
Blakeman's original decision was seen as a response to rants made by Trump on Truth Social last week.
In
response to the US flag potentially being left at half-mast during his
inauguration, Trump said that Democrats "don't love our country" and are
"giddy."
"In
any event, because of the death of President Jimmy Carter, the Flag
may, for the first time ever during an Inauguration of a future
President, be at half-mast," Trump said.
Democrats don't love our country?
He
was never fit to be president. He's a mad sociopath who is not fit to
represent the American people and who only knows how to sew division.
Which makes him the ultimate LOVE CONNECTION for Elon Musk, right?
Yesterday
was many things including the fourth year anniversary of the treasonous
attack on our country. Rachel Maddow addressed that last night on
MSNBC.
Let's wind down with this from Senator Patty Murray's office:
70,000+ seniors in Washington state, 4.5 million seniors
nationwide will save hundreds or thousands of dollars each year thanks
to the new annual cap on out-of-pocket prescription drug costs for folks
on Medicare Part D
***PHOTOS AND B-ROLL OF THURSDAY’S PRESS CONFERENCE AVAILABLE HERE***
In case you missed it: on January 1, a new provision
that Democrats in Congress got signed into law went into effect,
capping out-of-pocket prescription drug costs for seniors with a
Medicare prescription drug plan at $2,000 a year. On Thursday, U.S.
Senator Patty Murray (D-WA), a senior member and former Chair of the
Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee, joined
U.S. Representative Kim Schrier, M.D. (D-WA-08) at Northaven Senior
Living in Seattle to highlight the new costs savings for millions of
seniors.
The new cap is thanks to the Inflation Reduction Act Democrats
passed through Congress in 2022—that every single Republican voted
against—and it means millions of seniors will pay significantly less for
their prescription drugs this year, lowering costs for families and
giving them more breathing room.
“Starting January 1st, anyone with a Medicare prescription
drug plan—also known as Medicare Part D—now has their out-of-pocket drug
costs capped at two thousand dollars each year. That’s because of a law
Democrats passed—the Inflation Reduction Act—that did all sorts of
things to lower health care costs and make it cheaper and easier for
folks to get the medications they need,” said Senator Murray.“As
everyone knows, high drug prices come with other painful costs—like
stress over how to make ends meet, or what bills to skip, in order to
fill a prescription, or whether to take the risk of rationing
medication. These are impossible choices that no one should ever have to
make. But they’re the reality for so many people, and so many seniors
especially. And make no mistake, when prescription drugs are too
expensive for people to afford—that’s dangerous. Because even the best,
most effective medication can’t do someone any good if they can’t afford
to get it.”
Medicare Part D—a voluntary program that helps pay for prescription
drugs for people with Medicare—provides prescription drug coverage for
nearly 56 million Americans. More than 4.5 million
older Americans enrolled in Part D are estimated to benefit from the
new out-of-pocket spending cap that took effect January 1, 2025.
Approximately 1.4 million Part D enrollees
who reach the new out-of-pocket cap between 2025 and 2029 will see
annual savings of $1,000 or more, and just over 420,000 will see savings
of more than $3,000. In Washington state, at least 70,000 seniors are expected to see these new savings—nearly $1,900 in 2025—and that number will steadily increase over time.
The $2,000 annual cap is just one of the many actions Democrats took to lower prescription drug costs in the Inflation Reduction Act.
Most notably, the law capped the cost of insulin for patients on
Medicare at $35/month—which went into effect January 1, 2023—and it
empowered Medicare to negotiate lower prescription drug prices for the
first time ever.
In August, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) announced negotiated drug prices
for ten commonly-used drugs in the first cycle of negotiations. The
new, lower negotiated prices will go into effect on January 1, 2026, and
will lower the prices people pay for some of the most common and
expensive prescription drugs that treat heart disease, cancer, diabetes,
blood clots, and more.
Allowing Medicare to negotiate prescription drug costs is expected
to save American taxpayers $6 billion, with people enrolled in Medicare
expected to save $1.5 billion in out-of-pocket costs in 2026 alone. 15
to 20 more drugs will be added to the negotiating table every year
moving forward – all thanks to Democrats’ Inflation Reduction Act.
See coverage of the landmark new prescription drug cap below:
Seniors on Medicare Part D will never pay more than $2,000
out-of-pocket for prescription drugs annually, thanks to a provision in
the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act which takes effect this year. The new
benefit for seniors on Medicare Part D will cap out-of-pocket
prescription drug costs at $2,000 per year. Once they reach this dollar
amount, they will automatically receive “catastrophic coverage,” which
means all out-of-pocket costs for Part D drugs will be covered through
the rest of the year. […]
In Washington state alone, 70,000 enrollees will save nearly $1,900 in 2025, with the number of beneficiaries growing over time.
“[It’s] a change that will save millions of people, hundreds or
thousands of dollars on their prescription medications, every year from
now on,” said U.S. Senator Patty Murray, who is a senior member of the
Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee. “There is more
to this story than just numbers—because as everyone knows, high drug
prices come with other painful costs. Like stress over how to make ends
meet, or what bills to skip, in order to fill a prescription, or whether
to take the risk of rationing medication.” […]
“This cap means I can afford my medications without having to cut
back on essentials like food or utilities,” said Katherine O’Hara, a
local senior who is on Medicare.
Stephan Gerhardt, who lives with dystonia and degenerative disc disease, also praised the change.
“One of my anti-inflammatory medications isn’t covered by my
insurance, but luckily, it only costs $45 a bottle and lasts six
months,” Gerhardt said. “I’m fortunate compared to others.”
Gerhardt, who has been on Medicare for over a decade due to his
disabilities, said the new law will help many seniors in his community
avoid tough choices between essential needs.
“People I know often have to decide: ‘Do I eat, pay rent, or take my
meds?’” said Gerhardt. “Almost everybody will choose to pay rent because
they can’t survive being homeless; and then it’s, ‘How do I figure out
food?’”
“This is life-changing for folks who can’t afford their medications,”
said Gerhardt. “It reduces the strain on individuals and the healthcare
system. If people can afford their medications, they’re less likely to
end up in emergency rooms, which costs everyone more in the long run.”
Despite the bipartisan benefits, every Republican in Congress voted
against the Inflation Reduction Act, a point highlighted by Murray. She
warned of potential future efforts to repeal the law.
“This is about making life more affordable and ensuring no one has to
risk their health because they can’t afford medication,” Murray said.
“The President-Elect has talked about cutting everything, so he’s got
everything in front of him, and we’re going to make sure this is not one
he goes after.”
Sen. Patty Murray held a press conference Thursday in light of a cap
on prescription drug costs for some on Medicare going into effect.
Out-of-pocket costs for prescription medications will be capped at
$2,000 a year for seniors on Medicare Part D. Part D is a voluntary
program that pays for prescription drug medication that covers nearly 56
million Americans.
The change was included in the Inflation Reduction Act that was passed in Congress in August of 2022. […]
“As everyone knows, high drug prices cause other painful costs, like
stress over how to make ends meet, or what bills they needed to skip in
order to take a prescription, or whether to take the risk of rationing
medication,” Murray said. “Those are impossible choices that no one
should ever have to make, but they’re the reality for many people and
many seniors.”
Other provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act also take aim at drug
costs for people with Medicare. The cost of insulin is capped at $35 a
month and recommended vaccines like the flu, shingles, COVID-19 and RSV
are free to everyone with Medicare Part D, according to U.S. Department
of Health and Human Services.