10/10/2023

chaya raichik is so ugly

this is from 'lgbtq nation:'


Anti-LGBTQ+ social media personality Chaya Raichik – who got famous by posting videos of LGBTQ+-supportive teachers and baselessly accusing them of grooming children – posted a picture of a queer Biden administration official and called him a “total weirdo.” But instead of getting just the usual reaction from her fans who love to bully visibly queer and trans people, she faced a torrent of backlash from gay Twitter.

She posted a picture of Tyler Cherry, the principal deputy communications director for the Department of the Interior. He isn’t a household name by a longshot, but he has a public-facing job and he wore some earrings and a striped jacket for his official portrait. 


what an idiot she is.  i'm looking at her photo in the article and thinking, 'oh, i get it.'  and i do.  she's so ugly on the inside because she's so ugly on the outside.  where does she get off knocking any 1?  she looks like she's balding (that middle part shows way too much scalp) - and she's only 33.


which is allegedly 1 inch more than her boobs.  there's no way tiny tits is 32 in the bust as she claims online.  and she named her son 'lynn.'  lynn?  


she's so ugly and stupid.  she looks like caitlyn jenner's ugly sister.  and those awful eye brows.  

another report of interest is by finbarr toesland ('lgbtq nation'):


Until the repeal of the Buggery Act in 1861, gay sex was a capital offense in England, forcing queer people out of public life. However, even during the extremely hostile environment before the repeal, ‘Molly Houses’, often coffeehouses, pubs or taverns, were created where queer people could meet and socialize.

Named after the slang term molly, which was usually used to refer to effeminate, homosexual men, Molly Houses quickly became the go-to meeting place for queer men in 18th-century England.

In court records from a buggery trial in 1724, a policeman named Joseph Sellers who visited a Molly House reported seeing “a company of men fiddling and dancing and singing bawdy songs, kissing and using their hands in a very unseemly manner.”

What is clear from reports at the time, typically from testimonies given in court cases, are the mock rituals the Mollies would perform. From adopting a female persona, alongside a feminine name and mannerisms, to cross-dressing on Festival Nights and conducting mock births and marriages.

Many of the sexual encounters and rituals were comedic in nature and were aimed at making a masquerade of straight conventions and parodying aristocratic manners.


though liars try to tell you different, gay is not abnormal or new.  as long as there have been people, there have been lgbtq+ people.  the inability to accept that is some sort of personal problem and that's the problem, not people who are lgbt1+.  


let's close with c.i.'s 'Iraq snapshot:'


Tuesday, October 10, 2023.  Iraq's prime minister goes to Moscow, the Iraqi people stand in solidarity with the residents of Gaza, the Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani issues a statement, Junior and Cornel carry out their vanity runs, and much more.



Iraq continues to increase its presence on the international stage.  Today, for example, Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani is in Moscow meeting with Russian president Vladimir Putin -- the first such visit for an Iraqi prime minister in eleven yearsSinan Mahmoud (THE NATIONAL) explains, "The meeting will take place against the backdrop of the war between Israel and Palestinian militants in Gaza that has seen thousands killed since the weekend." Yesterday?  Mariam Nihal and Sinan Mahmoud (THE NATIONAL) explain:

Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia Al Sudani met Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan on Monday in Baghdad and discussed a wide range of issues, including the escalation of violence between Gaza and Israel.

Saudi ambassador to Iraq Abdulaziz Al Shammari, and Abdulrahman bin Arkan Al Dawood, director general of the office of the minister of foreign affairs, also attended.


The events taking place are the big story of the week and in the US there is a lot of posturing and a lot of nonsense.  Nonsense?  How about the selective start point?  The pretending that all was well until Hamas launched an attack?  The notion that such an attack is a complete surprise and no one can figure out what it was launched?  As MINT explained over the weekend:


In a statement, Hamas commander has said that it launched attacks on the Israeli territory ‘in defense of Al-Aqsa’ which was stormed by Israeli settlers a few days ago. Al-Aqsa has been the flashpoint between Palestine and Israel. Hamas military commander Muhammad Deif, who released a recorded message after the attack, said the strikes were in retaliation for Israel’s “desecration of the Al-Aqsa" mosque in Jerusalem.


At COMMON DREAMS, Julia Conley notes a corporate media segment she finds worthy of praise.




 AMY GOODMAN: We’re going to go from Orly Noy right now in Jerusalem -- you can hear the wind blow on her mic as she talks to us about the Israeli reaction — to Raji Sourani, head of the Palestinian Center for Human Rights in Gaza. I want to go to you quickly, Raji, because I understand you’re experiencing unprecedented bombing in your area. Can you describe what’s happening in Gaza? The media in the United States, there’s almost no one in Gaza to bring us voices of Gazans. Raji, can you hear us?

RAJI SOURANI: — the last 60 hours, I mean, Gaza subject to nonstop bombing. It’s ongoing all over the place. There is no single place you can call a safe haven in Gaza, airplane fighters, drones ruling all over the sky. And it’s your lottery number, whether it’s an apartment, whether it’s tower with hundreds of apartments, whether it’s a house, whether it’s a hospital, whether it’s a school, a shelter used by UNRWA. I mean, even the marketplace of Jabaliya, the biggest refugee camp in the Middle East for Palestinians — 300,000 Palestinians there — were bombed, and almost 80 have been killed, I mean, this morning, and tens injured in very, very critical situation. And all this is happening in the daylight, and no one is caring about that.

Netanyahu says Gazans should leave Gaza. Where to? Even we don’t have safe passage. And the minister of defense say, “We are going to cut electricity, water, food, oil” — everything, I mean, will be cut on Gaza. So, 2.4 million civilians in Gaza are subject to unprecedented situation, which it’s very genocidal.

It’s coming from the highest level in Israel. If they have a problem with Hamas, we have no problem. They can contact them. If they have with Jihad Islamic, with Fatah, with the fighters of the resistance, that’s fine. This is not our area of interest. But our area of interest, it’s the civilians, and the civilians who are really in the eye of the storm, and they are the subject for the Israeli ongoing crimes.

And still Mr. KK, the ICC prosecutor, keeps silent, doing nothing, moving nowhere in this conflict, and doesn’t hold Israel accountable for the ongoing crimes they committed over the course of years — suppression, oppression, killing, blockade, apartheid — name it. I mean, all the menu of the crimes are there, which listed at Rome Statute, and no one is moving. No one is moving to provide any level of protection toward Palestinian civilians.

Once and again, this is going on now. At the course of these 60 or 70 hours, I mean, we’re having hundreds of people have been killed. Just children, we have above 100 children have been killed. Women, almost the same number. And the worst yet to come. We are sure, and we know that.

AMY GOODMAN: The Israeli prime minister has told Gazans to leave. It’s unclear, of course, where you’d be able to go. Then they said that he was misunderstood, that he was saying you should leave the Hamas sites in Gaza. Can you respond to this, Raji Sourani?

RAJI SOURANI: This is nonsense. This is nonsense. He is leading Smotrich and Ben-Gvir. He is leading people who say Palestinians don’t exist, and who said, “Palestinians should leave. This is the land of Israel. This is the historical land of Israel, and we are taking over. There is no other state, and there is no other people. There is one people. There is one self-determination. It’s for the Israeli Jews.” So, he’s a big liar. It wasn’t a slip of tongue. He came after cabinet meeting and after a meeting with his top security and military people, and he was reading from a paper. So, it cannot be a mistake. He knows what he said, and he meant what he said. And I do believe what they are doing, deliberately, will lead to that, if this is continued and they don’t stop.

AMY GOODMAN: What level of support does Hamas have — Hamas is the government of Gaza — right now, since Saturday morning, the actions of the thousands or so Hamas fighters breaching the wall?

RAJI SOURANI: I don’t think it’s matter — I don’t think it’s matter of the people’s support or not. You have to know, when you are suppressed deeply by a criminal, belligerent occupation, when you are suffocated — do you hear? Do you hear the bombing?

AMY GOODMAN: We hear it.

RAJI SOURANI: And here right now the entire house shaking, while I’m talking to you. I’m living in the best area of Gaza — all right? — and should be away from every problem, but everything around us has been bombed. And you don’t know, never, your lottery number, when it can be. There is no safe haven in this place. I lived all my life in this part of the world. I lived the mathematics and the chemistry. But I never, ever witnessed anything as such. And I’m telling you, I mean, if the Israelis made it — and they did — the land incursion, situation will be much, much worse than this. Massacres will happen, I mean, to civilians.

AMY GOODMAN: You have heard, I assume, that Israeli tanks and military equipment are making their way to Gaza right now. So you’re being bombed by the air, but the question is: Will there be a total land invasion? Can you respond to what this means? Just to give people a sense, you’re talking about this strip of land, Gaza, that’s about the size of Detroit. There are about 600,000 people in Detroit. We’re talking about 2.4 million people. It’s one of the most densely populated areas on Earth. Raji, if you could take it from there?

RAJI SOURANI: Exactly, Amy. Gaza is one of the most densely populated areas on Earth, as you know. And if the army comes in, it will be like elephant in the garden. But I don’t think any would love to be a good victim. They want to strip us not from our own security. They don’t want to strip us from the food of our children. They were not satisfied of having this criminal, belligerent occupation. They are not satisfied with the blockade. They are not satisfied with the killing and the bombing and [inaudible] wars that’s been happening in the last 10 years. But they want to do more. I think it’s not human to be a good victim. We are the stones of the valley. We have been here since ever. We will continue here forever. And I think, I mean, if the Israelis did that, that means they are just melting the people of Palestine, of Gaza, just to be one body defending their very existence. This is our right and obligation. As the French say, resistance, it’s not only, I mean, right, it’s your dignity, Amy. And people shouldn’t be good victim for a criminal, belligerent occupation.

When Russia invaded Ukraine and occupied Ukraine, the whole world stopped, and they said, “We cannot support Russia, and we have to support the Ukrainians against the occupation of the Russians. And we will support them not only politically. We will support them with money. We will support them with arms. We will support them with all what we can.” And they asked all the free people of Europe and U.S. to go and join the forces and to join the resistance in Ukraine against the occupation.

I don’t know why Palestinians, if they die, are a criminal; if we think, we are a criminal and terrorist; if we do peaceful intifada, we are terrorists. And when the Israelis doing massacres, one after another, they’re just being supported, as had happened yesterday, by U.S. and by major European countries. It’s shame. It’s shame to leave Israel practicing the rule of jungle in this way against the Palestinian civilians.

AMY GOODMAN: I’m not sure if the —

RAJI SOURANI: All what we want — all what we want is simple and clear: end of occupation. We want dignity and freedom, period, like any other people on Earth.

AMY GOODMAN: Raji, I’m not sure if this is the blast we just heard, but Middle East Eye is reporting Israel just bombed the Islamic University of Gaza. Is that near you?

RAJI SOURANI: It’s exactly 800 meters from me. And that’s when I wasn’t able, Amy, to talk to you. I mean, the entire building was like collapsing on our head..



Iraq’s top Shia cleric Grand Ayatollah Ali Sistani has urged all Muslims across the world to help the Palestinian people amid the Israeli regime’s relentless strikes on the Gaza Strip.

“We call on all Muslims to come to the assistance of the Muslim people of Palestine [and] respond to their loud cries for help,” the senior cleric said in a message on Monday.

Grand Ayatollah Sistani also urged all Muslims to do their utmost to "deter the aggressors," reclaim the usurped rights of Palestinians, and save them from Israel's onslaught.

He added that the Islamic land of Palestine should be saved from "usurping aggressor."

Calling up an unprecedented 300,000 reservists, Israel has declared a long war on Gaza in response to Operation al-Aqsa Storm, which started on Saturday.

The resistance fighters say they have waged the operation against the occupying regime in response to its decades-long campaign of bloodshed and destruction against Palestinians.


There are plans for a large protest in Iraq on Friday.  How large?  It must be pretty large because Moqtada al-Sadr -- cleric and cult leader -- has injected himself into it after others started the real work in putting it together.  That is how he gets the media to promote him as 'powerful,' by the way, glomming on to the work of others. 



Speaking of those with nothing to offer . . . 




Is he wearing Blackface?  Is he trying to out Trump Donald Trump?  And it's a screen shot, I'm not interested in posting his video.  


Philadelphia has survived so much including  the Moyamensing Killers and the Blood Tubs war in the 19th century, 1844's Nativist Riots . . .  Yesterday, they had to endure political gadfly Robert F. Kennedy Jr delivering his salute to Joan Crawford.




Yesterday, he used the city to launch his latest vanity campaign -- he will now seek the US presidency by running as an independent.  Last week, Cornel West cultists and crazies were praising Cornel's move to do the same because . . . well, they're stupid.  






Renee Johnston spoke with Dr Jared Ball last Saturday on BLACK POWER MEDIA (video above) and offered the facts others didn't -- namely that state-by-state registration will be a headache with different rules from state-to-state and how an independent campaign often lacks those on the ground to gather signatures, etc.



 Till now, he had run as a Democrat, garnering a polling average of about 15% in the primary, according to RealClearPolitics. What will happen running as an independent is unknown. Some observers think Kennedy might pull more votes away from Trump than Biden, but the election is too uncertain and too crucial for comfort. A poll conducted by John Zogby Strategies for the American Values 2024 PAC, which supports Kennedy, looked at a matchup among Trump, Biden and Kennedy as the independent candidate. The result: Trump and Biden tied at 38% with Kennedy at 19%.

A victory over Biden by any of the Republican candidates would be a serious setback for the climate policies advanced by the Inflation Reduction Act, various White House initiatives and regulatory rulemaking. But a second Trump administration would create a climate catastrophe. Trump dismantled climate policies and rolled back more than 100 environmental rules governing clean air and water — without being particularly organized. In a second term, he’s pledged to radically transform the civil service, including environmental agencies. The stakes are too high and the margins are potentially too close for anyone concerned about the environment to view Kennedy as a safe vote for the climate. 


We're going to bear down on that topic in just a minute.  But let's note that John Stauber Tweeted his sadness because he wanted Junior to run as a representative of the Libertarian Party (what is about these crazies who think non-party members can just push ahead of everyone in line and claim a nomination due to their name) because he "could have had 50 state ballot access."  Yes, that is a comparison to Cornel West.  Ruth noted: "No one knows who he would draw from.  But he has no chance at winning and he should not be running."

Exactly.  

And that's true of Cornel as well.  Both men have decided to step away from political parties and instead run their own campaign as independents.

They're not going to win.

I have stated before and it has been the position here since this site began 19 years ago that your vote is your vote and you should use it however you want (which includes making the decision not to vote).  That remains true.  

That's voting.  Running for office?  That's a different thing.  Junior and Cornel need to drop their vanity runs.  They're not going to win.  They have nothing to offer -- look at the push back to Cornel's embarrassing statements on what's taking place in Gaza -- and all they're going to do is pull votes from others. 

They're not going to win.

Now someone will, for example, get the Green Party nomination.  And they're going to run for president.  That's fine.  They can use that run to build the party.  

There is no party that Cornel or Junior are trying to build.  These are vanity runs.  There's no point to them running.

And there's no point in just calling out Junior.  That's bothering me a lot.  The same wasted campaign --wasting money, wasting press coverage -- is  being run by Cornel.  See Ava and my "Media: What was the plan? (There was none)" for why Conrel decided to run as an independent -- it was too much work to run for a party's nomination.  He's now running a vanity campaign as is Junio.  They're both distractions -- at best.




Leading up to Monday’s announcement there had been some speculation that Kennedy would announce he would seek the presidential nomination of the Libertarian Party. Last month, the New York Times reported that in July, Kennedy spoke privately for over an hour with antisemite Angela McArdle, the chair of the Libertarian Party, while both were attending a conference in Memphis, Tennessee.

“He emphasized that he was committed to running as a Democrat but said that he considered himself very libertarian,” McArdle said in an interview with the Times on the summer meeting. “They agreed on several positions, including the threat of the ‘deep state’ and the need for populist messaging,” the Times added, with McArdle claiming that she and Kennedy were “aligned on a lot of issues.”

“My perspective is that we are going to stay in touch in case he does decide to run,” McArdle said. “And he can contact me at any time if that’s the case.”

Further cementing his ties with the far right ahead of his “independent” launch, on October 6, the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) announced that Kennedy and Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy would headline the CPAC “Investor Summit to Save America” in Las Vegas, Nevada, from October 18-21.

CPAC Chairman Matt Schlapp praised Kennedy Jr. for “ensuring the constitutional right of medical freedom,” a reference to his anti-vaccine conspiracy theories. Schlapp said that Kennedy joining the event was a reflection “of the splintering of the left-wing coalition that has gone full woke Marxist to the point that traditional liberals don’t feel welcome anymore.”

A who’s who of Trump co-conspirators will be joining Kennedy at the CPAC later this month, including Steven Bannon, fascist War Room host and former special adviser in the Trump White House; Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton; and Kash Patel, an intelligence operative who was chief of staff to acting Secretary of Defense Christopher Miller during the attack on the Capitol on January 6, 2021.

Like Trump, Kennedy Jr. is able to exploit the broad antiwar sentiment in the working class by professing opposition to Biden and the Democrats’ escalating war in Ukraine. However, Kennedy’s antiwar facade suffered a serious blow this weekend following his latest pledge for unstinting military support for Israel’s war against the Palestinians. 



Catherine Lucy (WALL STREET JOURNAL) reports:


Four of Kennedy’s siblings said in a statement Monday that his independent run was “dangerous to our country.” It went on: “Today’s announcement is deeply saddening for us. We denounce his candidacy and believe it to be perilous for our country.” The statement was signed by Kerry Kennedy, Rory Kennedy, Joseph P. Kennedy and Kathleen Kennedy Townsend.

 

It needed to be said especially since he can't stop using his late uncle to try to grab the presidency.  "Let's put another Kennedy in the White House" is tacky and it's offended a lot of the family -- as it should.  But if the grifter couldn't stand on his uncle's shoulders, he would be polling even worse than he currently is.



"I'm here to declare myself an independent candidate for president of the United States," he told a crowd of supporters in Philadelphia. "But that's not all − I'm here to join you in making a new Declaration of Independence for our entire nation."


A new Declaration of Independence.  Hmm.  What's wrong with the old one, Junior?  It opened:

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America, When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.


Let's note the film PROTOCOL starring Goldie Hawn.  Her character Sunny Davis takes a group of visitors  to view the Declaration of Independence and later reflects:


You know what I read the other day? The Declaration of Independence. I mean, the real one. You know, the original, the one in the Archives? Boy, those guys knew how to say what they thought. Talk about simple. I mean, all that stuff about happiness. What government talks about happiness anymore?

But by all means, let's allow a crackpot to write a new 'and improved' Declaration of Independence.

 
The press can't seem to get Junior or Cornel right.  They are not making a third-party run -- as Rachel Looker -- among others -- wrongly states in her USA TODAY report.  The two men are running as independents.  They are not affiliated with any party.  (Although Cornel may still have the Socialist Alternative's backing.)  There's a world of difference between an independent candidate and a third-party candidate just as there's a world of difference between a swing-voter and an independent voter to note another term the press struggles with annoying those of us who actually majored in political science.  Not only is it the wrong jargon factually, it also ignores that yesterday Junior stated he declared his "independence from the Democratic Party and independence from all parties."  

(I also dispute Rachel Looker's label of "ultra-conservative" for Alex Jones when the far more apt term is "conspiracy nut."  She mentions Alex Jones because he's a Junior supporter. AP bills him as "a conspiracy theorist" suggesting that he spends time in a medical lab testing out his hypotheses. )


The following sites updated: