i just finished a post and was about to publish when c.i. phoned.
i've saved to draft and depending on the way things go, i will either post it tomorrow or do a new entry.
when you read c.i.'s post, you will realize that c.i. is ill. i'm very upset about that. and i've made clear that i will not allow any 1 to trash c.i. and get away with it. (you may have to scroll around to find it. it will be the long thing and it will talk about the attack on the community.)
the post i had for tonight went after those who attacked c.i. i will post it tomorrow depending on the behavior of 1 of 2 men. (isn't it always men?)
c.i. has taken the 'high road' (a phrase i apparently coined, but we'll go into that tomorrow -- in the meantime, pay up if you're using it because there's a delicious rumor going around about me, don't worry, i'm not shy about dishing).
the result has been that ron of why are we back in iraq has been bullying and abusive.
i don't stand for that. i don't give bully men (whether they beat up on the sick or just the well) a pass. and what ron did with the slam against the common ills community was disgusting. when you realize that he knew c.i. was ill, it's even more disgusting.
when you know that c.i.'s been bullied repeatedly in e-mails by ron on sunday and monday you know what kind of person you're dealing with.
c.i. hasn't let me read the post. i'm sure c.i. will have the oprah moments and every thing else in the post. but you're going to hear from c.i. on what went down.
and it wasn't pretty and ron can rewrite anything he wants but i'll be damned if i'll shut my mouth and take the high road.
high road, high road, high road! go spread some more rumors, ron.
there is a 2nd person involved in this. c.i. feels that the 2nd person doesn't know the facts. i think c.i.'s going to get screwed over for not going with everything all at once. i hope i'm wrong.
c.i. spent all night on that post. i know because i was asked to hold my posts until that was going up. (and i'm happy to do it and would do anything for c.i. except look the other way when some bully's attacking.)
at the last minute, information was passed on by community member dallas and c.i. attempted an addendum to deal with that. 'in fairness,' it's going up without it. c.i. was trashed by this person. i say ditch the 'in fairness' and go for the jugular. but that's me.
me, i wouldn't give some 1 a chance to reply when they've already replied with things that i will call, generously, half-truths. but i'm out for blood. maybe the person was misinformed by ron.
and maybe i'll be surprised by the 2nd person's actions. i hope i'm surprised.
