though i didn't ask who you'd like to see run, the clear choice in the e-mails was russ feingold.
if he does seek re-election, every 1 believes the dems lose the white house in 2012.
from the sane to the crazy. lambert (corrente) writes about glenn greenwald's latest column and lambert buys it wholesale:
Even so, in a sane world they still they got nuthin, since even if Assange solicited the material from Manning, that's not any different from what investigative journalists did, back in the day when we had them, or what even the craven bootlicker Bob Woodward still does today.that's an excerpt. if you use the link, check out the comments, especially this person:
The court of public opinion is the only one I know of where conviction based upon the testimony of a co-conspirator is an easy task.
a co-conspirator? you mean like adrian lamo?
every 1 at corrente - including lambert - calls bradley manning a law breaker.
i see now why c.i. gets so pissed when she reads about this stuff.
does no 1 understand a damn thing about our legal system?
bradley's not been convicted of a damn thing at this point nor has he issued a confession. so it sure is nice of lambert and the others to do the government's job for them and convict bradley manning. real damn nice.
let's close with c.i.'s 'Iraq snapshot:'