above is Isaiah's THE WORLD TODAY JUST NUTS "Chelsea's Days of Faux Rage" and it's wonderful.
there's little, however, to praise about 'the new york times.'
it's always been a mouthpiece for the israeli government and has frequently allowed conflicts of interest in their coverage - you or your child can serve in the israeli army and you can still cover israel for the paper, for example.
the paper's long hated the palestinian people.
they went after vanessa redgrave with lies when she won the oscar.
those lies made it onto 'saturday night live' which rushed to earn brownie points.
vanessa's crime was refusing to pretend that the paletinian people deserved to die, refusing to go along with the media circus insisting palestinian lives did not matter.
'the new york times' is at it again.
matt peppe ('counterpunch') reports:
That the New York Times demonstrates a systematic editorial
bias in favor of Israeli state power and against Palestinian rights is
old news. Whether it is reporting on the Boycott, Divest and Sanction
(BDS) movement, the deadly Gaza flotilla raid, cease fire violations
between the IDF and Hamas, or any other aspect of the conflict between
Israel and the Palestinians, the New York Times reliably acts as a
mouthpiece for propagating Israeli hasbara (propaganda). Aside from its
“objective” reporting, this editorial bias also manifests itself in the
narratives that make their way into the Opinion section. On Feb. 14,
the paper allowed a spokesperson for the illegal settlers in the
occupied territories to openly advocate violations of the Fourth Geneva
Convention and the establishment an apartheid state in Mandatory
Palestine.
let the record show that 'the new york times' has never stopped attacking palestinians.
let's close with c.i.'s 'Iraq snapshot:'
Monday, February 20, 2017. Chaos and violence continue, The Mosul Slog
continues, the US Defense Secretary visits Iraq, and much more.
US Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis is in Baghdad.
US Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis is in Baghdad.
Al Jazeera English
"We're not in Iraq to seize anybody's oil."
- US Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis aje.io/pqpl
CBS News
Defense Secretary Jim Mattis distances himself from Pres. Trump's media bashing: cbsn.ws/2ljZjSr
The Washington Times
Bloomberg
U.S. Defense Secretary Jim Mattis says there's no plan to seize Iraq's oil bloom.bg/2m37ToA
Jennifer Griffin
We'll have a full report tonight on Defense Secretary Jim Mattis visit to Baghdad on @SpecialReport @BretBaier #Mosul
Phil Stewart
US Defense Secretary Jim Mattis lands in Baghdad on unannounced trip
Defense Secretary Jim Mattis just landed in Baghdad; will meet commanders and Iraqi leaders for update. #secdef #Mosul #MosulOffensive
Mattis visit comes days after meeting with Kurdistan Regional Government President Massoud Barzani.
Of that meet-up, the US Defense Dept noted:
WASHINGTON, Feb. 18, 2017 — Defense Secretary Jim Mattis met with Kurdistan Regional Government President Masoud Barzani in Munich yesterday, a Defense Department spokesperson said in a statement.
The two men affirmed their commitment to their partnership to defeat the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, the statement said, and they discussed the latest developments in the Mosul operation and the key role Peshmerga forces have played in the counter-ISIS fight.
Mattis and Barzani both noted the important military cooperation between the government of Iraq and the KRG, the statement said. They agreed battlefield success over the past year was made possible by strong cooperation between the government of Iraq, the Kurdistan Regional Government and the United States.
Donald Trump has not said he would seize Iraq's oil.
But the press loves to act as though he did.
It's actually great when they repeat it.
They remind the world that wars are about resources.
Even better would be if they'd explain how Iraq's oil has been seized by the IMF and the World Bank.
But that would require actual reporting.
Fortunately, Iraqis who listen to Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani are aware of what took place, even if the western media blacks it out.
While Mattis is in Baghdad, US Vice President Mike Pence recently met with Iraq's prime minister Hayder al-Abadi.
Personally thanked Iraqi PM @HaiderAlAbadi for sacrifices in shared fight against ISIS & discussed long-term partnership.
No, the photo has not been doctored.
Hayder really is that short. (Pence is five feet and eleven inches tall.)
It's said his small stature helped him escape Iraq in the 80s as he posed as a tiny peasant woman, gathering himself up in a large shawl. He'd remain out of Iraq for decades, returning only in April of 2003 -- like so many other cowards -- once the foreign forces sent Saddam Hussein out of his Baghdad home.
When not clothed as a woman, Hayder supported armed insurrection in Iraq though, as far as anyone knows, he was not plotting against the US or killing US troops the way former Iraqi prime minister Nouri al-Maliki had done while he was out of Iraq.
In 2014, FRONTLINE (PBS) briefly noted:
Maliki climbed the ranks quickly, rising to lead the Dawa branch in Damascus, an assignment that has fueled questions about what role -- if any -- he played in several high-profile attacks carried out by the group. In 1981, for example, Dawa operatives launched a suicide attack that killed 61 people at the Iraqi embassy in Beirut. Two years later, they struck the U.S. and French embassies in Kuwait.
That's the Dawa political party -- which Hayder belongs to as does Nouri al-Maliki. And which the US government has embraced repeatedly throughout the administrations of Bully Boy Bush and Barack Obama.
Is it any wonder that today is day 126 of The Mosul Slog?
Back in June of 2014, the Islamic State seized the city of Mosul.
Only last October did Hayder al-Abadi launch an operation to liberate or 'liberate' the city.
The 'success' has been the semi-liberation of east Mosul -- only semi due to the renewed violence there in the last 14 days.
Now useless tag alongs (embedded with the Iraqi military) try to sell the operation as dynamic.
They're idiots.
As Shelly Culbertson and Linda Robinson (RAND) noted earlier this month:
The liberation of Mosul will not be complete with the military operations that oust ISIS. Failing to get the civilian response right risks a short-term pyrrhic victory and widening civil war in Iraq.
This should concern the U.S., as instability in Iraq threatens U.S. foreign policy interests in the Middle East and violence that continues to create large numbers of refugees.
Steps are required to manage the needs of displaced civilians and get them back home. Since the start of the conflict with ISIS, a peak of 3.4 million Iraqi civilians were displaced by violence, and 3 million remain displaced today. An additional half million people may be displaced during the fight to take back remaining parts of Mosul.
On our recent trips to Erbil and Baghdad, where the military and humanitarian responses to Mosul are being managed, we spoke with numerous stakeholders and identified key challenges that will need to be resolved to stabilize Mosul and get its civilians back home.
The government of Iraq is sending displaced persons from Mosul into camps instead of allowing them to move to other urban areas due to concerns that there might be ISIS collaborators among the displaced.
The civilians' identification documents are taken from them for as long as they stay in the camp. They are permitted to return to their homes when it is considered safe, but widespread destruction of public, residential, commercial and agricultural infrastructure means that it may be years before they can go home.
While security concerns are understandable, a solution must be found that respects international norms against holding displaced civilians in detention.
We visited two emergency camps a short distance from Mosul. Khazer is a tent city of over 32,000 people, next to Hassan Sham with a similar number. Despite the valiant efforts of aid workers to supply basic needs, these emergency camps are not equipped to house Iraqis for more than a few months.
In addition to the flimsy tents without electricity, only outdoor pumps for water, no 24-hour health care services, and no spaces where people could prepare hot food, community activities and psychosocial treatment is lacking for these traumatized people who fear for their futures.
Important issues.
And ones regularly missing in the western press coverage.
But the embedded 'reporters' are too busy bedding down with Iraqi forces to think about the Iraqi people.
New content at THIRD:
- Truest statement of the week
- Truest statement of the week II
- A note to our readers
- Editorial: Is there really so little news on Iraq?...
- TV: HBO finally scores another hit
- TV: Free speech
- Still no State Dept. press briefing
- Worthless Stupidity
- Tweet of the week
- NBC has a hateful bitch problem on their hands
- This edition's playlist
- U.S. Senators Tammy Baldwin and Thom Tillis Introd...
- Isakson Statement on Confirmation of Dr. David Shu...
And Isaiah's THE WORLD TODAY JUST NUTS "Chelsea's Days of Faux Rage" went up earlier this morning.
iraq
