|
Wednesday,
August 8, 2012. Chaos and violence continue, a government prosecutor
is targeted in Iraq, Nouri betrays the latest agreement, Iraqi
politicians worry what Nouri might have of them on tape, the
withdrawal-of-confidence vote comes to a halt, and more.
The
administration didn't want a welcome home parade for the veterans in
December of later this year. Some reasons were valid. The country is
supposed to be watching the spending and the money Congress had
originally allocated for a national parade had actually been spent years
ago. Some reasons made no sense at all. The administration claimed
that since some Iraq War veterans were in Afghanistan currently, it
wouldn't be right to have a parade for Iraq War veterans. When the US
finally leaves Afghanistan, what will the excuse be? There will always
be -- barring a major shift in foreign policy -- US troops stationed on
something other than American soil. The administration also felt the need to pressure NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg not to hold a parade.
What
happened instead is that parades have taken place in local
communities. St. Louis is where it kicked off. Craig Schneider and Tom
Appelbaum got together and organized a parade for the veterans. It was
a huge success that spawned many other parades. In July, many people
were disappointed, some were outraged. I was outraged (see " The violence and the whores" and " Iraq snapshot") and so was Trina (" Thanks Tom Appelbaum").
Across the country people worked very hard, inspired by the work in St.
Louis to do something to acknowledge the veterans. This was
individuals working together. And there were plans for future parades
later in the year. But the parades worked because they were about the
veterans.
Tom Appelbaum decided to whore the
parade in July (see Trina and my pieces). He turned the St. Louis
parade into an advertisement for Barack Obama. The ridiculous
commercial credited Barack with the parade. Barack didn't donate an
hour of organizing or a dime from his bank account. Nor did he attend
the parade. The parade was about the veterans and Tom Applebaum didn't
(my opinion) have enough respect for the veterans to refuse to whore for
the Obama campagin. The parade had nothing to do with Democrats or
Republicans or any label other than "veteran."
Craig
Schneider co-organized the parade. He did not take part in the Obama
campaign commercial. He has penned a column for the St. Louis Post-Dispatch entitled " People, not politics." It is an intelligent and deeply felt column. Please use the link to read the entire column. Here is an excerpt.
The
news was personally upsetting for two reasons. First because its
message is in clear contradiction of the apolitical nature of the
501(c)3 organization that grew from the January event, upon which the
two volunteers sat. The organization has asked for their resignation.
But
the bigger concern about the ad stems from how upside down it seemed to
turn the very nature of the movement that began in St. Louis and has
since spread to more than 20 cities. All around the country this year, a
loose and unpaid coalition of volunteers from all sectors has come
together in the universal understanding summarized by the motto of this
grass-roots movement: Those who did and still serve are people. They
aren't politics.
Since the beginning of the
post-9/11 age of combat, one of our greatest failures as a society has
been the emotional distance we've allowed ourselves to keep between our
wars and the people we send to fight them. We've placed the enormous
burden of 10 years of multi-front warfare onto less than 2 percent of
our population, forcing men and women to leave home and go risk death
not once, but two or three or four times. Or more. While our sons and
daughters have died, taken bullets and bombs for us and returned from
multiple trips to hell with wounds both inside and out, the other 98
percent of us back here have bickered over "the troops" as if they were
some abstract thing.
They are not. They are people. They are us.
Again,
it is a very important column. Craig Schneider works to put veterans
first. In the Congress, the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee is an
example where party label is not an issue of great importance and
Democrats and Republicans who might not work together on any other issue
find a way to come together over what's in the best interests of
veterans. Though all members of the Committee reach out to one another
(including Senator Bernie Sanders who is neither a Democrat or a
Republican), the largest credit for that has to go to Chair Patty Murray
and Ranking Member Richard Burr who set such a strong example and such
high standards. Without that example and that desire to work together,
this week's victory would not have taken place. As Kat noted last night in " Camp Lejeune (justice finally)," the victims of Camp Lejeune finally got recognized with President Barack Obama signing into law
the Honoring America's Veterans and Caring for Camp Lejeune Families
Act of 2012. This is an issue that Senator Burr has worked years on.
Chair Murray said it would get a floor vote and it did. She said it
would be signed this summer and it was.
The Senate is in recess allowing its members to return home. That doesn't mean work stops. Senator Murray's office notes:
FOR PLANNING PURPOSES
Wednesday, August 8th, 2012
CONTACT: Murray Press Office
(202) 224-2834
TOMORROW: VETERANS: Murray in Seattle to Discuss New Veterans Jobs Bill with Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Senator
Murray will outline Veterans Jobs Corps bill, legislation that helps
veterans overcome barriers they face when finding employment
(Washington,
D.C.) -- Tomorrow, Thursday, August 9th, 2012, U.S. Senator Patty
Murray, Chairman of the Senate Veterans' Affairs Committee, joins
Secretary of Veteran Affairs Eric Shinseki at the Port of Seattle for a
press conference on veterans jobs. Senator Murray will highlight a bill
she is sponsoring in the Senate, the Veterans Jobs Corps bill. Senator
Murray's bill is modeled of successful job training programs across the
country and in states like Washington. The Veterans Jobs Corps bill
would build on the gains already made with Senator Murray's VOW to Hire
Heroes Act, and serves as a $1 billion investment in veterans and their
capacity to strengthen America.
Over the
next five years, the Veterans Jobs Corps would: increase training and
hiring opportunities for all veterans; help restore and protect
national, state, and tribal forests, parks, coastal areas, wildlife
refuges, and cemeteries. It will also help hire qualified veterans as
police, firefighters, and first responders at a time when 85 percent of
law enforcement agencies were forced to reduce their budget in the past
year. Senator Murray will point out that this bill contains bipartisan
ideas, is fully paid for with bipartisan spending offsets, and should
not be controversial at a time when veterans continue to struggle.
The
Port of Seattle was recently recognized with The Freedom Award, the
Department of Defense's highest recognition given to employers for
exceptional support of our Guard and Reserve members.
WHO: U.S. Senator Patty Murray
Secretary of Veterans Affairs Eric Shinseki
Tay Yoshitani, Port of Seattle CEO
Veterans currently employed by the Port of Seattle
WHAT: Senator Murray and Secretary Shinseki discuss new veterans jobs legislation
WHEN: TOMORROW: Thursday, August 9th, 2012
10:00 AM PT
WHERE: Port of Seattle Marine Maintenance Facility
25 S. Horton Street
Seattle, WA 98134
###
Kathryn Robertson
Specialty Media Coordinator
Office of U.S. Senator Patty Murray
448 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington D.C. 20510
202-224-2834
Tomorrow
the high for the day in Baghdad is supposed to be 45 degrees Celsius
(113 degrees Fahrenheit). And as if Iraq didn't have enough hot air of
late, two government spokespeople try to add to it. Mohammad al-Qaisi (al-Shorfa) reports
that Ministry of the Interior spokespersons Hikmat Mahmoud al-Masari
and Adel Dahham see al Qaeda in Iraq 'imploding' and they know -- in
their heart of hearts, they really, really know -- this is happening due
to events like last month when they discovered the bodies of two
leaders in one house -- both were dead!
The
events of today have already slapped them across the face. But, since
thinking caps appear to be in short supply at the Ministry of the
Interior, let's provide them the walk through that they're too dumb to
see.
Whether it's a mafia movie or a vampire
movie, when the 'bad guys' start turning up dead, that generally means
that something even more violent and destructive has decided to move in
and take over. So rejoicing over those two dead leaders? The Ministry
of the Interior would be better off grasping something more powerful
than those two leaders is now what they will be up against.
July 22nd,
the Islamic State of Iraq released an audio recording announcing a new
campaign of violence entitled Breaking The Walls which would include
prison breaks and killing " judges and investigators and their guards."
The last weeks have demonstrated that ISI is serious about pursuing
those goals. Their determination is also clear with an attack on a
government prosecutor this morning. KUNA reports unknown assailants invaded a Baiji home (Salahuddin Province) and killed 8 members of one family. Kitabat adds
that a government prosecutor lived in the house and that one of the
sons was also an attorney. In addition, they note that the attack took
place at five in the morning and that there was some effort to burn the
corpses after. Alsumaria quotes
a police source stating that the assailants stormed the home, firing
automatic weapons as they did, killing the government prosecutor, his
father, his sisters and brothers and a family member that hasn't been
identified so far. Xinhua identifies
the prosecutor as Adnan Khayrallah and they note, "The attackers shot
dead Adana, his father, three women, two children along with a guest,
the source said without giving further details." The Hong Kong Standard spells
the name of the prosecutor as "Khayrallah Shati" and says he and his
wife, their five sons and an unidentified 8th relative were killed.
The
big story in Iraq today is a fear of political violence. What would
you do if you held public office in a fundamentalist nation and,
privately, you did a few things you'd like to keep hidden? And what
would you do if you then found out that those private moments had been
taped?
Both Kitabat and Al Mada report
the big rumor swirling around Baghdad: Nouri plans to destroy
political rivals via "sex tapes." Spy equipment and technology have
been used in the homes and offices of rivals -- Nouri's bugged them.
There has been talk of blackmail tapes being used as signatures were
gathered for a withdrawal of confidence vote in Parliament. The rumors
tended to glom on Iraqi President Jalal Talabani -- that Nouri had
persuaded him to switch sides via a meeting where he showed Jalal the
fruits of his spying. There are said to be sound and video recordings.
MP Haider Mullah states that this would be "cheap" and "undignified" if
it has taken place. The articles note an AKnews report on a female MP
being taped having sex with her husband. The article is in Arabic -- no English version at AKnews -- and it states that government employees have secretly filmed her having sex with her husband.
The rumors -- which have swirled since the end of May -- probably
gathered heat as a result of an event earlier this week. Dropping back
to Monday's snapshot:
All Iraq News notes
that someone has released a fuzzy (audio and video) taped meeting from
last year between Vice President Tareq al-Hashemi and Iraqiya leader
Ayad Allawi following Allawi's meeting with Grand Ayatollah Ali
al-Sistani. Iraqiya is calling for an investigation into where the tape
originated and who released it. As the rumors swirl, Alsumaria notes,
Speaker of Parliament Osama al-Nujafi has declared that the move
towards questioning Nouri before Parliament has now come to a halt. Al Mada's
report notes the CIA has taped many Iraqi politicians and that may
remind some of when the US was spying on the United Nations in 2003. Martin Bright, Ed Vulliamy and Peter Beaumont (Observer) reported:
The
United States is conducting a secret 'dirty tricks' campaign against UN
Security Council delegations in New York as part of its battle to win
votes in favour of war against Iraq. Details of the
aggressive surveillance operation, which involves interception of the
home and office telephones and the emails of UN delegates in New York,
are revealed in a document leaked to The Observer. The
disclosures were made in a memorandum written by a top official at the
National Security Agency - the US body which intercepts communications
around the world - and circulated to both senior agents in his
organisation and to a friendly foreign intelligence agency asking for
its input. The memo describes orders to staff at the agency,
whose work is clouded in secrecy, to step up its surveillance operations
'particularly directed at... UN Security Council Members (minus US and
GBR, of course)' to provide up-to-the-minute intelligence for Bush
officials on the voting intentions of UN members regarding the issue of
Iraq. A year later, Ewen MacAskill (Guardian) reported:
The
United Nations spying row widened on Friday when former weapons
inspector Hans Blix revealed he suspected his UN office and his home in
New York were bugged in the run-up to the Iraq war.Dr Blix
said he expected to be bugged by the Iraqis, but to be spied on by the
US was a different matter. He described such behaviour as disgusting,
adding: "It feels like an intrusion into your integrity in a situation
when you are actually on the same side."He said he went to
extraordinary lengths to protect his office and home, having a UN
counter-surveillance team sweep both for bugs. "If you had something
sensitive to talk about, you would go out into the restaurant or out
into the streets," he said.Dr Blix's fears were reinforced
when he was shown photographs by a senior member of the Bush
Administration that, he insists, could only have been obtained through
underhand means.His accusations came after former British
cabinet minster, Clare Short said US-British intelligence bugged the
office of the United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan.Probably not a good idea for the US to be without a US Ambassador to Iraq currently.
Would the US tape Iraqi politicians and turn the goods over to their
pet Nouri to allow him to blackmail other politicians? Both the Bush
administration and the Barack administration spent their waking hours
with activities that ensured people would be ready to believe such a
rumor.
The US-brokered an agreement recently.
Remember? It was going to lower tensions between the Iraqi military and
the Peshmerga (KRG force). That was Monday. AKnews reports
today that the agreement has yet to be signed. In what the Kurds will
most likely see as a huge betrayal of this new agreement, AKnews reports,
"A force from the Iraqi army has been stationed at the borders of
Saadiya, Diyala province, said a chief of Kurdistan Democratic Party
(KDP) in Saadiya. The force from the 20th Army Brigade which was
stationed in Meqdadiya before has been moved to Saadiya on the pretext
that the security of Saadiya is deteriorating, said Hassan Abdul-Rahman,
KDP chief of Khabat neighborhood in Saadiya."
'Security'
Nouri style. Blackwater once provided 'security' (terrorized the
Iraqis) in Iraq. They went on to become Xe and now Academi. Like many a
shady person, they employ mulitple aliases. Joseph Neff and Jay Price (McClatchy Newspapers) report
on how the US government has again betrayed the people: "The military
contractor formerly known as Blackwater ended a long-running criminal
investigation Tuesday by admitting to lawbreaking that ranged from
possessing illegal machine guns at its Camden County, N.C., training
grounds to attempting to land $15 billion in oil and defense contracts
in southern Sudan while U.S. companies were barred from doing business
there." They broke the laws and all the multi-billion dollar business
has to do is pay a measly fine of $7.5 million dollars. They hurt
Iraqis and no one will do jail time for this offense or any other.
Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2012/08/07/160843/contractor-formerly-known-as-blackwater.html#storylink=cpy
Meanwhile
the same administration that overseas letting Blackwater off scott free
is the administration that wants to lock Bradley Manning away forever.
Bradley's court-martial was scheduled to begin September 21st. Monday April 5, 2010, WikiLeaks released US military video of a July 12, 2007 assault in Iraq. 12 people were killed in the assault including two Reuters journalists Namie Noor-Eldeen and Saeed Chmagh. Monday June 7, 2010, the US military announced that they had arrested Bradley Manning and he stood accused of being the leaker of the video. Leila Fadel (Washington Post) reported
in August 2010 that Manning had been charged -- "two charges under the
Uniform Code of Military Justice. The first encompasses four counts of
violating Army regulations by transferring classified information to his
personal computer between November and May and adding unauthorized
software to a classified computer system. The second comprises eight
counts of violating federal laws governing the handling of classified
information." In March, 2011, David S. Cloud (Los Angeles Times) reported
that the military has added 22 additional counts to the charges
including one that could be seen as "aiding the enemy" which could
result in the death penalty if convicted. The Article 32 hearing took
place in December. At the start of this year, there was an Article 32
hearing and, February 3rd, it was announced that the government would be
moving forward with a court-martial. Bradley has yet to enter a plea
and has neither affirmed that he is the leaker nor denied it.
Bob
Lederer: This is Bob Lederer with John Riley reporting for WBAI 99.5 FM
and we're here at Fort Meade, Maryland. And today we've just finished
the 6th pre-trial hearing in the court-martial of accused whistle blower
Bradley Manning -- the openly gay Army intelligence analyst who is
facing 22 charges stemming from his alleged disclosure of nearly 3/4 of a
million documents and videos to WikiLeaks. Some of these materials
show evidence of War Crimes and other inappropriate conduct by the US
government and its allies. The pre-trial hearings have been presided
over by military Judge Denise Lynd. The actual court-martial trial over
which she will also preside is not expected to begin until some time
next year.
This is part two of Bob Lederer and John Riley's reporting. We noted the first part in the August 1st snapshot. Marcia pointed out
that night that she was suprised (and angry) to learn that the
court-martial was being postponed. Apparently, to allow Barack to look
his best before the election, the court-martial of a whistle blower must
take place after America votes. Bradley's already been imprisoned for
over 800 days.
Bob Lederer: Another
ruling by the judge had to do with the next pre-trial hearing scheduled
for August 27th through 31st at which Bradley Manning's lawyer will
argue that Manning who has been held now in pre-trial detention for
upwards of two years was subjected to eight months of illegal treatment
in solitary confinement at the Marine Brig in Quantico, Virginia.
Kevin, can you summarize what that treatment was? What witnesses
and physical evidence his attorney moved to be require be provided
during the upcoming hearing? And what the judge ruled on this issue?
Kevin Gostola:
So the defense reported this in December 2010. And he said, on his
blog, he keeps a blog, and he updated everyone on the fact that Bradley
Manning was in solitary confinement for 23 hours a day which is
something that the government says he wasn't in solitary confinement.
That's just not what they call it. He talked about how Bradley Manning
was under confinement conditions that stemmed from something that the
Marines or the military calls "prevention of injury watch." Or suicide
risk. So a detainee can be placed under this restriction and that means
that he's a maximum custody prisoner or it's believed that he could
endanger himself. So they do these things to him that could be
considered onerous or inhumane basically. And one of these things has
to do with having to wear a smock. So in some instances he was
stripped naked because he said something that a commanding officer did
not like and the commanding officer.
A
military police officer, John Riley explained, then interrupted the
interview. "This is freedom of the press at Fort Meade," declares Kevin
Gostola. Today, Rob Kall (OpEdNews) interviewed Dr. Jill Stein and, among the topics they discussed was, her recent arrest. Excerpt.
Rob
Kall: Now from my understanding is that you came to Pennsylvania, went
to Harrisburg. You were involved in getting things finalized and then
you got yourself arrested.
Jill Stein: That's right. For the first time in my life, I have to say.
Rob Kall: Good. Congratulations.
Jill Stein: That's right. I'm now a member of a very big club. Yeah.
Rob Kall: Well what happened?
Jill
Stein: We -- You know we have a very strong network in Pennyslvania
that Cherie Honkala is very much connected with. And this is the Poor
People's Economic Network. And they and Cherie and the Green Party have
been fighting the foreclosure crisis that is just raging in
Philadelphia and other places around the country. So we have been long
supporting two women and their families that have been trying to hold
onto their homes and are basically in the foreclosure process thanks to
Fannie Mae which we as tax payers basically own. They continue to throw
families out of their homes. And these two women in particular had
very unjust cases against them. One had inherited the house from her
mother. Yet when her mother died, the bank put it into foreclosure and
refused to deal with her. She's a working woman. She lives in the
house. She has the ability to absorb the mortgage which, by the way
was a reverse mortgage in order to take of the mother's health problems
in her final years. Another example of what's broken -- our health car
system. And we're having to put our homes into hock in order to afford
health care in this unjust health care system. And we're having to put
our homes into hock in order to afford health care in this unjust health
care system. And then people are getting thrown out of their homes
because the banks are looking to do that, looking for every excuse they
can get to take possession of a home which is completely unjust and, you
know, illegal. Every legal means has been pursued including efforts to
change these laws and nothing has been forthcoming. So we went into
Fannie Mae, along with a large group of supporters, had a demonstration
outside on behalf of these two home owners. And we basically went into
Fannie Mae to ask them to please sit down, to bargain in good faith
to keep these home owners in their homes. And they offered to
basically buy them off for a small fee. They offered them $2,000 if
they would just go away bit did not offer really to negoiate and revise
their morgates agreements and enable them to -- recognize them as owners
of their homes and allow them to stay. So we all sat down until such a
time as they would do this and five of us were arrested -- basically
for trespassing.
Rob Kall: Had you thought ahead and planned to do this? Was this a decision that you made ahead of time?
Jill
Stein: Well we made the decision that we were going to go to the mat
for these home owners and that we were going to do everything in our
power to make the banks do what they're supposed to do -- which is
negoiate to keep home owners in their homes. That's why we bailed them
out -- you know, to the tune of some four-and-a-half-trillion dollars
in bailouts. Plus another 16 trillion in free loans. You know that was
in order to keep home owners in their homes and protect our communities
from the devestation of foreclosure which is not just a problem for the
home owner. It's really a problem for the whole community. And it
beomes really a blight of vacant buildings which is a real problem,
brings down everybody's home.
YK:
You have been running your campaign both at the grassroots level and
the electoral level. Tell me about bringing those two together.
JS:
It's about bringing the fight that's going on at the grassroots level,
for our homes, for jobs, for affordable healthcare, to have tuitions
that a student can afford. These fights are actively going on in our
communities, but they are not currently represented in electoral
politics. They are not on the horizon of two major parties, they are
busy talking about Mitt Romney's tax forms or latest gaffes, anything
but the real problems that Americans are struggling with and how we are
going to fix them. Bringing the grassroots struggle into electoral
politics and challenging the hijack of our electoral system and Wall
Street gives me the liberty to talk about what we need and how we are
going to fix these things. We need a green economy if we are going to
survive. The public is aware that we need to bring the troops home now.
It's so exciting to me that there is a kind of real focusing now of the
public voice, and the public mindset, and to my mind it's very
exciting to be able to provide a political vehicle for that consensus
that has begun to really come into focus.
YK:
The assumption that both the Republicans and Democrats work on is that
Americans lean to the right, and therefore the national debate must
constantly be moved rightward to engage the most people possible. But
your experience seems to show a different consensus.
JS:
I think it's pretty clear from polls across the country that there is a
rapidly declining interest in the Democrats. The approval of Congress
is in the single digits. It's no secret that people are not happy with
what the two political parties are proposing. We launched our campaign
at a middle of the road university in Illinois [Western Illinois
University]. I was asked to come by a woman who was my campaign manager
on campus and asked me to come on election night. So I thought it over
and called her back and said 'Sure,' because young people are what our
campaign is all about, the only campaign that is actually addressing the
crisis that young people are facing. Of course we are going to come, we
are going to kick off our campaign at your college. I had six minutes
to explain to a group that had never voted green or lefty or
independent.
He
withdrew from Iraq, yes, but on Bush's timetable; he escalated the war
in Afghanistan; he spent a billion dollars intervening in Libya; he
continued the "extraordinary rendition" program; and failed not only to
close the prison at Guantanamo Bay, but even to prosecute its inmates in
our civilian federal courts.
Domestically,
I don't even want to discuss Obamacare, which is not national health
insurance by any stretch of the imagination, but we must. I still find
it surreal that the Democrats, controlling the White House and both
houses of Congress, failed to institute national health insurance,
partly because the administration, and the party's recent
vice-presidential nominee (Joseph Lieberman), bowed to the insurance
lobby.
On the energy front, the U.S. has
not even begun a serious transition to alternatives to carbon fuels.
And, somehow, the Democrats have become a party that supports capital
punishment, despite massive evidence that it has failed miserably and is
applied in a racist manner. Economically, the president extended the
Bush-Paulson bailouts and acquiesced in renewal of the Bush tax cuts,
despite repeated vows to the contrary.
As
for social spending, I expect the Republicans to advocate cuts in
Medicare and Social Security, but I'm still trying to figure out how the
Democrats can, with a straight face, do the same. Furthermore, in a
policy that boggles the mind, Obama brags about having cut the payroll
tax, the primary source of funding for Social Security.
The
Green Party is on the other side of all those issues, foreign and
domestic. I don't agree with everything the Greens advocate, but on the
issues that I consider most significant for America's future, the Greens
are on the right track.
The television star has long been an outspoken supporter of LGBT rights. She was named
The Advocate's "Person of the Year" in 1994 and included in its "Heroes" list
for successfully fighting producers and network executives to include
some of television's first realistic portrayals of gay characters. She
has two siblings who are gay and who have long been in relationships.
Barr's sister and partner have been together for 25 years and have twin
daughters. Her brother and partner of 26 years have grandchildren.
"They deserve every ounce of equality with any other Americans," Barr told The Advocate. "They are wonderful, productive human beings, and are the reason I am such an activist for LGBT issues and always will be."
Always the comedian, she added, "I just wish one of my relationships had lasted as long as theirs!"
Among the key points in her platform,
Barr says she wants to cut back on military spending and bases abroad,
bring troops home, create a financial-transaction tax, crack down on
corporate outsourcing of jobs overseas, and remove caps on taxes for the
rich. She also wants to create a single-payer health-care system and
legalize marijuana.
She
believes prison time should be reserved for violent criminals—with the
exception of the Wall Street bankers who have "defrauded the working
class and middle class," she says. "Those people should be in jail."
She
thinks her history as a comedian works in her favor, not against. "In
order to be able to write a good joke, you have to find the truth," she
says. "I've spent 30 years as a comedian focused on working-class
issues. Working-class people do not have a vote in this country. That's
the real reason why I'm running and why I've put up my own money to seek
ballot access in all 50 states. I will keep running till I win."
Barr
says the government is "not supposed to be run like a business" and is
"supposed to protect people from fat cats." She adds, "They had the big
bubble that they created. If you watched cable TV, you just saw all the
time: 'Time for a second mortgage!' That was a scam, just theft." She
calls the battle between Republicans and Democrats a choice between
"Satan and Satan."
| 
