i found myself asking that question during the 2nd hour of the diane rehm show on npr (the highly sexist diane rehm show) as iraq was briefly mentioned and elise began babbling conspiracy theories passed off as fact.
1st, they're all so damn stupid.
they were talking about the 3,000 soldiers staying in iraq option that fox news reported on tuesday.
that is 1 option JUST ONE that the white house is exploring.
but it made the headlines so it's the only thing they know.
they're real idiots on the diane rehm show - diane's an idiot herself.
they're non-readers discussing the news. this was friday, keep in mind.
on wednesday, c.i. was pointing out that this was ONE OPTION and that idiots were missing the point:
a number of options. but the idiots on the diane rehm show can't read.
they're functional illiterates apparently.
and then came elise off her meds.
as they discussed this, elise went wild with barack desire insisting he didn't want to keep u.s. soldiers in iraq, it was the military!!!!!
she is f**king nuts. cnn needs to speak to her about it.
if the military is pressuring barack, if, explain to me:
1) leon panetta was brought into the administration by barack. leon panetta is secretary of defense (and supposedly the biggest supporter of the 3,000 option). that's barack's man, elise.
2) david petraeus was once the top u.s. commander in iraq, then barack moved him on over to afghanistan and now barack's made him head of the c.i.a. if the military is out of control, why would barack put petraeus in charge of the c.i.a.?
there is no logic. just elise talking crazy.
is she a reporter or is she a mental patient?
and her justification of the troops that will remain saying they aren't the same thing as combat troops?
she's a f**king whore. elise labott knows better. she's just whoring.
f**k her and her crazy talk and cnn better speak to her about what she's allowed to say and not to say when it comes to damaging the cnn brand.
let's close with c.i.'s 'Iraq snapshot:'