if you read, listen or stream, you'll see that bradley's father believes he's innocent. you'll also learn that he's been able to see bradley several times.
now we've all lied to our parents at 1 point. that could be the case here. there could be any number of possibilities going on.
and 1 of those is that bradley is innocent.
and i want to point out that while the likes of kevin zeese and libbyliberal and countless others were so quick to do the government's job for it and convict bradley in the court of public opinion, c.i. kept saying stop.
c.i. kept screaming it.
she repeatedly pointed out that bradley had entered no guilty plea, made no public statement and people needed to wait and see what bradley was pleading before they started declaring him the wikileakers.
it's a real shame so many were so stupid.
it pisses me off that c.i. has to repeatedly be the 1 to point out logical flaws and offer some discipline for which she is then attacked in countless e-mails.
you might try listening to her. sunday at 3rd we wrote a number of pieces:
- Truest statement of the week
- Truest statement of the week II
- A note to our readers
- Editorial: Bull F**king S**t
- TV: Rebirth or last gasp?
- Memo to AFL-CIO, communication is key
- How bad are the movies these days?
- And we did find out
- Iraqis continue fighting back
- The US already has enough wars
and a lot of people clucked over it - glenn glenn greenwald, for example.
but c.i.'s the 1 who called it bulls**t. she's the 1 who said, 'they can give him paper scrubs.' guess what. they're now giving him a disposable smock. just like was advocated in the editorial.
time and again, 1 woman works her ass off and the others skip around and play.
c.i. carries the burden and then some.
let's close with c.i.'s 'Iraq snapshot:'