Sex and Politics and Screeds and Attitude: al bore's back again

8/10/2017

al bore's back again

al gore?

the pretend environmentalist.

he's got another movie about how wonderful he is, but 1 that fails to address real issues.

rachel krantz ('common dreams') explains:

Simply put, animal agriculture is one of the main culprits behind climate change. An Inconvenient Truth failed to address this, and people have been wondering whether the sequel would make up for it, particularly since it again stars Al Gore, who himself went vegan after realizing the connection between animal agriculture and global warming. Unfortunately, as James Cromwell and I were about to find out, the sequel likewise failed. And that’s truly disappointing.

Instead, too much of the new documentary was devoted to spotlighting former vice president Gore as a leader, rather than informing viewers about the many concrete actions they can take to limit their carbon footprint, like adopting a plant-based diet.

At the end of the film, the audience is asked to take the pledge to #BeInconvenient, to keep demanding that schools, businesses, and towns invest in clean, renewable energy. “If President Trump refuses to lead, Americans will,” the call to action reads, encouraging viewers who want to fight climate change to use “your choice, your voice, your vote.” This is great, but aside from a few seconds where Gore mentions that “agriculture is another major cause” of CO2 emissions, the link between climate change and eating animals is entirely left out of the film.

And any environmentalist worth her salt should find that outrageous.

The link between our diet and the environment is both direct and strong. To give you an idea, if every American committed to just one meat-free day a week, the impact would be equivalent to switching all our gas-powered cars to hybrids. In fact, according to research published in the journal Climate Change, if you adopt a plant-based diet, you’ll cut your carbon footprint in half.

Yet these facts are nowhere to be found in this supposedly environmentalist documentary.

al snore.

al the fake ass gore.

if you don't get it, read ava and c.i.'s 'global boring' from 2007.

let's close with c.i.'s 'Iraq snapshot:'

Thursday, August 10, 2017.

‏Verified account @SeanMcElwee

*movie preview voice* 
from the producers of Iraq War comes a new blood-soaked debacle, this time with
*record scratch*
real nuclear weapons 

34 replies417 retweets1,274 likes

Eli Lake: "Leaving aside means and only looking at outcome, regime change for North Korea would be a great outcome from a humanitarian perspective."

It's as though the last fourteen years never happened or happened without Eli Lake.

Iraq had regime change.

There's been no benefit -- that's across the board but certainly when it comes to "a humanitarian perspective."

Iraq still lacks a stable government -- forget one that governs fairly.

It remains one of the most corrupt nations in the world.

Population wise, it's a young country now with a median age of 19.9 years.

It's a country of orphans in many respects due to the never-ending violence.

A country of widows and orphans.

UN Refugee Agency‏Verified account @Refugees 22 hours ago

Without an income + often with children to support, Mosul’s war widows are among most vulnerable displaced in #Iraq: trib.al/cQDiQ4k

1 reply99 retweets87 likes

Areas of Iraq will produce birth defects for decades due to the weapons used there. (Used there by foreign forces -- the US-led coalition.)

Humanitarian includes medical and the US has bombed hospitals throughout the war as has the Iraqi government. In addition, doctors have been repeatedly targeted and threatened leading to many of them fleeing the country.

The education system is as frayed as everything else from the war. In the next 20 years, Iraq needs to build at least 20,000 schools as a result of many things including (a) the destruction of schools from bombings and (b) 'aid' that resulted in faulty construction.

I'm failing to see any benefits "from a humanitarian perspective."

And the Iraq War was supposed to be 'quick.'

Instead, it's 14 years later and still going.

‏ @Nidalgazaui

#BREAKING: #ISIS attacks #Iraqi army positions in the area of Diyuub in northern #Samara, kills several soldiers & burs 4 bulldozers.

1 reply4 retweets2 likes

‏Verified account @TheArabSource

In pictures: #ISIS sharpshooters sneak up on Iraqi Army checkpoints near Tal Afar aml.ink/JRPvf #Mosul #Nineveh

3 retweets3 likes

This is Iraq right now:

‏ @ajghamidi

US-backed Iraqi troops and militias assaulting and executing starved civilians found under the rubble in Old #Mosul pic.twitter.com/2w3qk9ccIk

10 replies122 retweets33 likes

Confused as to how this qualifies as a 'success' "from a humanitarian perspective."

‏Verified account @leloveluck

Overturned Blackwater conviction evokes darkest days of Iraq War: washingtonpost.com/world/middle_e… | @raghavanWaPo looks back to that day.

5 retweets5 likes

Darkest days?

What a load of nonsense.

THE WASHINGTON POST can call it the "darkest days" because it's a contractor and further removed from the US military.

Falluja in April or November of 2004.

The gang-rape and murder of Abeer by US soldiers.

The use of illegal weapons by the US-led coalition.

But Blackwater is the "darkest days"?

Far be it from THE WASHINGTON POST to ever call out the US government.

And speaking of which, shame on any US journalist writing about Blackwater today and still not telling reporters who was being protected.

Remember that?

Supposedly, a US official was being escorted by Blackwater that day.

All these years later, we can't even be told (a) if that was true and (b) if true, who it was?

The following community sites updated: